Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Home Depot, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

The Home Depot, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
2,160year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
8.5%175 of 2,059 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
4.3%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
5across 3 seasons
88.0% for8.2% against3.9% other8.5% against management2,126 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

2,160 Form N-PX filers reported votes at The Home Depot, Inc. for the year to 30 June 2026, across 4 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 175 of the 2,059 filers that reported a position voted against management (8.5%), 1.9 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 4.3% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
21 May 2026year to 30 June 20262,140128.5%
13 May 2026year to 30 June 2026310.0%
23 Mar 2026year to 30 June 2026310.0%
22 May 2025year to 30 June 20252,12985.8%
16 May 2024year to 30 June 20242,050116.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026The Home Depot, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management8.5%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management4.3%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 21 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal CProposal DProposal EProposal FProposal G
VanguardForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *For *For *For *AgainstAgainstAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
SEIForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
NationwideForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *Against *Against *Against *Against *Against *Against *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainstAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
MFSForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstFor *Against
PIMCOForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
AllspringForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Janus HendersonForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20242,0606.0%withheld
year to 30 June 20252,1565.8%4.7%
year to 30 June 20262,1608.5%4.3%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS50,96854.9%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES12,47713.4%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES9,1239.8%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE8,4679.1%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE5,5105.9%
AUDIT-RELATED4,1954.5%
COMPENSATION1,4621.6%
OTHER4840.5%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION1440.2%

Questions

How did large funds vote at The Home Depot, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,059 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at The Home Depot, Inc.; 175 voted against management (8.5%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at The Home Depot, Inc.?

Filers reported 7 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 6.8% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which The Home Depot, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list The Home Depot, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.