Vote Scores

Home / Guggenheim and Rydex / Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund

Form N-PX · fund registrantSEC filer no. 1864208

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund

fund voting report, part of Guggenheim and Rydex

Vote records reported
1,587year to 30 June 2026
Against management
24.2%385 of 1,590 marked votes
Say-on-pay support
74.7%for, of for + against + abstain
Shareholder-proposal support
not reportedtoo few votes to show
74.5% for12.3% against13.2% other24.2% against management1,590 votes

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund reported 1,587 vote records on Form N-PX. 385 of the 1,590 votes that were marked for or against management went against management: 24.2%, 18.0 percentage points above the median fund registrant (6.2%).

Weighted by the number of shares voted, the against-management share is 13.9%. The two figures differ when the votes against management fall on larger or smaller holdings than the rest.

On pay and on shareholder proposals: it voted for 74.7% of the section 14A say-on-pay items it reported (the median fund registrant: 91.6%).

By category, votes against management were most frequent in COMPENSATION (58.8% of 119), CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (32.4% of 68) and DIRECTOR ELECTIONS (27.0% of 868).

Compared with other filers

Each rate is defined once, in the methodology. The median is taken over 1,241 fund registrants with at least 25 vote records in the season.

year to 30 June 2026This filerMedian fund registrantAll filers pooled
Against-management share24.2%6.2%10.6%
Say-on-pay support rate74.7%91.6%86.0%
Shareholder-proposal support ratenot reported27.5%33.9%
Shares on loan, share of shares held0.00%0.00%3.12%
Largest families, year to 30 June 2026Against managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal support
Vanguard20.1%94.1%42.0%
BlackRock and iShares7.5%88.3%11.9%
Fidelity6.0%94.7%27.6%
Dimensional16.4%78.9%57.4%
State Street and SPDR16.9%77.1%50.4%

Votes by category

Filers choose one or more categories for each vote, so a vote can appear in more than one row. Category names are printed as Form N-PX defines them.

Category (as the form names it)VotesForAgainstAgainst managementSplit
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS8686345327.0%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES2031304425.1%
AUDIT-RELATED21221110.5%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES119218.2%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS1614212.5%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE898366.7%
COMPENSATION119497058.8%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE68472132.4%
OTHER9900.0%

By season

SeasonVote recordsAgainst managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal supportSplit
year to 30 June 20246,53016.8%82.4%48.6%
year to 30 June 20252,29221.8%79.8%73.3%
year to 30 June 20261,58724.2%74.7%not reported

Say-on-pay votes against management

Counting one say-on-pay item per company meeting, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund voted against management on 43 of the 169 it marked either way (25.4%) in the year to 30 June 2026. The 40 companies with the most reporting filers are listed.

Shareholder proposals it supported

Of 1 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the filings and on which it cast a vote, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund voted for 1 (100.0%). Titles are the most common wording among filers; where a wording could name a person, the SEC category is printed instead.

CompanyMeetingProposal
Lincoln National Corporation28 May 2026Require Independent Board Chair

Shares on loan

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund reported no shares on loan for the year to 30 June 2026. Shares lent out at the record date cannot be voted by the lender, which is why Form N-PX asks for the figure. More on lending and votes.

The filings

These figures are read from the filer's own Form N-PX. If a vote on this page looks wrong, the filing is the record: a dispute about a filed vote is a matter for the filer, and an error in how this site read the filing is a matter for corrections.

Questions

How did Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund vote on executive pay?

In the year to 30 June 2026 Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund reported 174 votes in the category SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES that were cast for, against or abstain. 130 were for (74.7%), 44 against and 0 abstentions. Counting one item per company meeting, it voted against management on 43 of the 169 say-on-pay items it marked either way.

How often does Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund vote against management?

24.2% of the time in the year to 30 June 2026: 385 of the 1,590 votes it marked as for or against management. Form N-PX asks each filer to state, vote by vote, whether the vote was for or against management's recommendation; this figure counts those marks.

Did Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund support shareholder proposals on climate?

It reported no votes on security-holder proposals in the category ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE for the year to 30 June 2026.

Is this the result of the meetings?

No. Form N-PX shows how this filer voted the shares it held. It does not show how other shareholders voted or whether a proposal was approved. Companies report certified results separately, on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From the Form N-PX filings of this filer on the SEC's EDGAR system, read as filed. The SEC does not verify the contents. Amended filings (N-PX/A) replace the filings they amend. Data on this page runs through 23 Sep 2026.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings by Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (filer no. 1864208), read as filed and not verified by the SEC. Amended filings replace the filings they amend. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.