Vote Scores

Home / Filers / Impact Asset Management GmbH

Form N-PX · institutional managerSEC filer no. 2068799

Impact Asset Management GmbH

institutional manager voting report

Vote records reported
502year to 30 June 2025
Against management
10.4%52 of 502 marked votes
Say-on-pay support
81.6%for, of for + against + abstain
Shareholder-proposal support
47.5%for, of for + against + abstain
89.0% for9.2% against1.8% other10.4% against management502 votes

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

In its Form N-PX for the year to 30 June 2025, Impact Asset Management GmbH listed 502 vote records. Votes against management made up 10.4% of those marked either way (52 of 502); the median institutional manager stood at 7.5%.

Weighted by the number of shares voted, the against-management share is 10.4%. The two figures differ when the votes against management fall on larger or smaller holdings than the rest.

On pay and on shareholder proposals: it voted for 81.6% of the section 14A say-on-pay items it reported (the median institutional manager: 91.3%) and it voted for 47.5% of the proposals put forward by security holders (the median institutional manager: 17.6%).

By category, votes against management were most frequent in SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES (17.9% of 39) and DIRECTOR ELECTIONS (7.3% of 372).

Compared with other filers

Each rate is defined once, in the methodology. The median is taken over 2,562 institutional managers with at least 25 vote records in the season.

year to 30 June 2025This filerMedian institutional managerAll filers pooled
Against-management share10.4%7.5%9.7%
Say-on-pay support rate81.6%91.3%84.3%
Shareholder-proposal support rate47.5%17.6%33.0%
Shares on loan, share of shares held0.00%0.00%2.20%
Largest families, year to 30 June 2026Against managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal support
Vanguard20.1%94.1%42.0%
BlackRock and iShares7.5%88.3%11.9%
Fidelity6.0%94.7%27.6%
Dimensional16.4%78.9%57.4%
State Street and SPDR16.9%77.1%50.4%

Votes by category

Filers choose one or more categories for each vote, so a vote can appear in more than one row. Category names are printed as Form N-PX defines them.

Category (as the form names it)VotesForAgainstAgainst managementSplit
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS372346187.3%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES3931717.9%
AUDIT-RELATED383800.0%
INVESTMENT COMPANY MATTERS2020.0%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES139423.1%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS1100.0%
COMPENSATION118318.2%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE2200.0%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE220100.0%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE220100.0%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION52340.0%
OTHER156946.7%

By season

SeasonVote recordsAgainst managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal supportSplit
year to 30 June 202550210.4%81.6%47.5%

Only one season is on file for this entry so far. The structured Form N-PX began with the year to 30 June 2024.

Say-on-pay votes against management

Counting one say-on-pay item per company meeting, Impact Asset Management GmbH voted against management on 7 of the 38 it marked either way (18.4%) in the year to 30 June 2025.

Shareholder proposals it supported

Of 29 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the filings and on which it cast a vote, Impact Asset Management GmbH voted for 16 (55.2%). Titles are the most common wording among filers; where a wording could name a person, the SEC category is printed instead.

CompanyMeetingProposal
Microsoft Corporation10 Dec 2024Report on Risks of Weapons Development
Microsoft Corporation10 Dec 2024Report on Data Operations in Human Rights Hotspots
Microsoft Corporation10 Dec 2024Report on AI Misinformation and Disinformation
NVIDIA Corporation25 Jun 2025Approval of a stockholder proposal to modify existing reporting on workforce data.
NVIDIA Corporation25 Jun 2025S/H Proposal - Corporate Governance
Apple Inc.25 Feb 2025A shareholder proposal entitled "Report on Ethical AI Data Acquisition and Usage"
Apple Inc.25 Feb 2025A shareholder proposal entitled "Report on Costs and Benefits of Child Sex Abuse Material-Identifying...
Citigroup Inc.29 Apr 2025Stockholder proposal requesting a report on financial statement assumptions and climate change.
Citigroup Inc.29 Apr 2025Report on Respecting Indigenous Peoples' Rights
Booking Holdings Inc.3 Jun 2025Reduce Ownership Threshold for Shareholders to Call Special Meeting
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated14 May 2025Shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, regarding excessive golden parachutes.
Synopsys, Inc.10 Apr 2025To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding shareholder ratification of golden parachutes
Cintas Corporation29 Oct 2024A shareholder proposal regarding disclosure of key diversity and inclusion metric
Cintas Corporation29 Oct 2024A shareholder proposal regarding political disclosure
Cintas Corporation29 Oct 2024A shareholder proposal regarding disclosure of managing climate risk through science-based targets and...
First Solar, Inc.14 May 2025Stockholder proposal to adopt a special shareholder meeting improvement

Shares on loan

Impact Asset Management GmbH reported no shares on loan for the year to 30 June 2025. Shares lent out at the record date cannot be voted by the lender, which is why Form N-PX asks for the figure. More on lending and votes.

The filings

These figures are read from the filer's own Form N-PX. If a vote on this page looks wrong, the filing is the record: a dispute about a filed vote is a matter for the filer, and an error in how this site read the filing is a matter for corrections.

Questions

How did Impact Asset Management GmbH vote on executive pay?

In the year to 30 June 2025 Impact Asset Management GmbH reported 38 votes in the category SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES that were cast for, against or abstain. 31 were for (81.6%), 7 against and 0 abstentions. Counting one item per company meeting, it voted against management on 7 of the 38 say-on-pay items it marked either way.

How often does Impact Asset Management GmbH vote against management?

10.4% of the time in the year to 30 June 2025: 52 of the 502 votes it marked as for or against management. Form N-PX asks each filer to state, vote by vote, whether the vote was for or against management's recommendation; this figure counts those marks.

Is this the result of the meetings?

No. Form N-PX shows how this filer voted the shares it held. It does not show how other shareholders voted or whether a proposal was approved. Companies report certified results separately, on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From the Form N-PX filings of this filer on the SEC's EDGAR system, read as filed. The SEC does not verify the contents. Amended filings (N-PX/A) replace the filings they amend. Data on this page runs through 30 Sep 2026.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings by Impact Asset Management GmbH (filer no. 2068799), read as filed and not verified by the SEC. Amended filings replace the filings they amend. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.