Home / Columbia Threadneedle / Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc.
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc.
fund voting report, part of Columbia Threadneedle
- Vote records reported
- 682year to 30 June 2026
- Against management
- 5.3%36 of 680 marked votes
- Say-on-pay support
- 92.5%for, of for + against + abstain
- Shareholder-proposal support
- 29.0%for, of for + against + abstain
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. reported 682 vote records for the year to 30 June 2026. It marked 5.3% of its votes as cast against management (36 of 680), close to the median fund registrant, which was 6.2%.
Weighted by the number of shares voted, the against-management share is 2.4%. The two figures differ when the votes against management fall on larger or smaller holdings than the rest.
On pay and on shareholder proposals: it voted for 92.5% of the section 14A say-on-pay items it reported (the median fund registrant: 91.6%) and it voted for 29.0% of the proposals put forward by security holders (the median fund registrant: 27.5%).
By category, votes against management were most frequent in CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (40.0% of 30), COMPENSATION (10.8% of 37) and SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES (6.5% of 62).
Compared with other filers
Each rate is defined once, in the methodology. The median is taken over 1,241 fund registrants with at least 25 vote records in the season.
| year to 30 June 2026 | This filer | Median fund registrant | All filers pooled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Against-management share | 5.3% | 6.2% | 10.6% |
| Say-on-pay support rate | 92.5% | 91.6% | 86.0% |
| Shareholder-proposal support rate | 29.0% | 27.5% | 33.9% |
| Shares on loan, share of shares held | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
| Largest families, year to 30 June 2026 | Against management | Say-on-pay support | Shareholder-proposal support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | 20.1% | 94.1% | 42.0% |
| BlackRock and iShares | 7.5% | 88.3% | 11.9% |
| Fidelity | 6.0% | 94.7% | 27.6% |
| Dimensional | 16.4% | 78.9% | 57.4% |
| State Street and SPDR | 16.9% | 77.1% | 50.4% |
Votes by category
Filers choose one or more categories for each vote, so a vote can appear in more than one row. Category names are printed as Form N-PX defines them.
| Category (as the form names it) | Votes | For | Against | Against management | Split |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECTOR ELECTIONS | 440 | 429 | 1 | 2.5% | |
| SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES | 62 | 49 | 4 | 6.5% | |
| AUDIT-RELATED | 56 | 55 | 1 | 1.8% | |
| SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES | 6 | 5 | 1 | 66.7% | |
| EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | |
| CAPITAL STRUCTURE | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21.4% | |
| COMPENSATION | 37 | 32 | 5 | 10.8% | |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 31 | 27 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | |
| HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | |
| DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | |
| OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | |
| OTHER | 1 | 1 | 0 | not reported |
By season
| Season | Vote records | Against management | Say-on-pay support | Shareholder-proposal support | Split |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| year to 30 June 2024 | 884 | 6.9% | 90.2% | 26.5% | |
| year to 30 June 2025 | 648 | 8.0% | 88.5% | 15.9% | |
| year to 30 June 2026 | 682 | 5.3% | 92.5% | 29.0% |
Say-on-pay votes against management
Counting one say-on-pay item per company meeting, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. voted against management on 4 of the 52 it marked either way (7.7%) in the year to 30 June 2026.
- Alphabet Inc. 5 Jun 2026
- Bill Holdings, Inc. 11 Dec 2025
- RingCentral, Inc. 31 Dec 2025
- NIQ Global Intelligence plc 21 May 2026
Shareholder proposals it supported
Of 61 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the filings and on which it cast a vote, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. voted for 18 (29.5%). Titles are the most common wording among filers; where a wording could name a person, the SEC category is printed instead.
| Company | Meeting | Proposal |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 20 May 2026 | Shareholder proposal requesting a mandatory independent board chair policy |
| NVIDIA Corporation | 24 Jun 2026 | Approval of a non-binding stockholder proposal requesting the replacement of supermajority voting... |
| Alphabet Inc. | 5 Jun 2026 | Shareholder proposal regarding equal shareholder voting |
| Visa Inc. | 27 Jan 2026 | Shareholder proposal on shareholder right to act by written consent. |
| Visa Inc. | 27 Jan 2026 | Require Independent Board Chair |
| QUALCOMM Incorporated | 17 Mar 2026 | Stockholder proposal entitled "Shareholder Ability to Call for a Special Meeting." |
| ServiceNow, Inc. | 21 May 2026 | Shareholder proposal regarding shareholder right to act by written consent. |
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 9 Dec 2025 | To consider and vote upon a shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting, regarding... |
| Lam Research Corporation | 4 Nov 2025 | Stockholder proposal titled "Realistic Shareholder Ability to Call for a Special Shareholder Meeting," |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 27 May 2026 | A shareholder proposal regarding annual vote regarding executive pay. |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 27 May 2026 | A shareholder proposal regarding disclosure of voting results by share class. |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 27 May 2026 | A shareholder proposal regarding dual class capital structure. |
| Synopsys, Inc. | 16 Apr 2026 | To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding 'stockholders' right to act by written consent |
| Marvell Technology, Inc. | 25 Jun 2026 | To consider and act on one stockholder proposal, entitled "Independent Board Chairman" |
| Airbnb, Inc. | 5 Jun 2026 | Dual-class sunset; and |
| ON Semiconductor Corporation | 14 May 2026 | To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding simple majority voting |
| Global Payments Inc. | 30 Apr 2026 | Shareholder proposal regarding shareholder right to act by written consent. |
| EPAM Systems, Inc. | 21 May 2026 | To hold an advisory vote on a stockholder proposal, entitled "Give Shareholders an Ability to Call for a... |
Shares on loan
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. reported no shares on loan for the year to 30 June 2026. Shares lent out at the record date cannot be voted by the lender, which is why Form N-PX asks for the figure. More on lending and votes.
The filings
These figures are read from the filer's own Form N-PX. If a vote on this page looks wrong, the filing is the record: a dispute about a filed vote is a matter for the filer, and an error in how this site read the filing is a matter for corrections.
- N-PX filed 18 Aug 2026 accession 0001193125-26-355179
- Every N-PX filing by this filer on EDGAR
Questions
How did Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. vote on executive pay?
In the year to 30 June 2026 Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. reported 53 votes in the category SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES that were cast for, against or abstain. 49 were for (92.5%), 4 against and 0 abstentions. Counting one item per company meeting, it voted against management on 4 of the 52 say-on-pay items it marked either way.
How often does Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. vote against management?
5.3% of the time in the year to 30 June 2026: 36 of the 680 votes it marked as for or against management. Form N-PX asks each filer to state, vote by vote, whether the vote was for or against management's recommendation; this figure counts those marks.
Did Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. support shareholder proposals on climate?
In the category ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE it reported 15 votes on proposals from security holders in the year to 30 June 2026 and voted for 0 of them (0.0%). Across every category it voted for 29.0% of security-holder proposals. Filers choose the category for each vote, so the same proposal can sit in different categories in different filings.
Is this the result of the meetings?
No. Form N-PX shows how this filer voted the shares it held. It does not show how other shareholders voted or whether a proposal was approved. Companies report certified results separately, on Form 8-K.
Where does the data come from?
From the Form N-PX filings of this filer on the SEC's EDGAR system, read as filed. The SEC does not verify the contents. Amended filings (N-PX/A) replace the filings they amend. Data on this page runs through 23 Sep 2026.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings by Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. (filer no. 1471420), read as filed and not verified by the SEC. Amended filings replace the filings they amend. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.