Vote Scores

Home / Families / Harris Associates and Oakmark / year to 30 June 2024

Form N-PX · fund family · year to 30 June 20242 filers grouped

Harris Associates and Oakmark

One season of the Harris Associates and Oakmark record. The family page shows the latest season.

Vote records reported
5,821year to 30 June 2024
Against management
2.7%154 of 5,649 marked votes
Say-on-pay support
99.6%for, of for + against + abstain
Shareholder-proposal support
8.5%for, of for + against + abstain
90.1% for8.4% against1.5% other2.7% against management5,676 votes

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

In its Form N-PX for the year to 30 June 2024, Harris Associates and Oakmark listed 5,821 vote records. Votes against management made up 2.7% of those marked either way (154 of 5,649); the median of the fund families tracked here stood at 8.5%.

Weighted by the number of shares voted, the against-management share is 5.3%. The two figures differ when the votes against management fall on larger or smaller holdings than the rest.

On pay and on shareholder proposals: it voted for 99.6% of the section 14A say-on-pay items it reported (the median of the fund families tracked here: 89.0%) and it voted for 8.5% of the proposals put forward by security holders (the median of the fund families tracked here: 35.1%).

By category, votes against management were most frequent in COMPENSATION (4.5% of 486), DIRECTOR ELECTIONS (3.7% of 2,699) and CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (3.1% of 930).

It reported 909,844 shares out on loan at record dates, 0.00% of the shares it held or had lent across the meetings it reported. Shares on loan are not voted.

Compared with other filers

Each rate is defined once, in the methodology. The median is taken over 60 families with at least 25 vote records in the season.

year to 30 June 2024This familyMedian familyAll filers pooled
Against-management share2.7%8.5%10.2%
Say-on-pay support rate99.6%89.0%84.6%
Shareholder-proposal support rate8.5%35.1%37.0%
Shares on loan, share of shares held0.00%1.34%0.08%
Largest families, year to 30 June 2026Against managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal support
Vanguard20.1%94.1%42.0%
BlackRock and iShares7.5%88.3%11.9%
Fidelity6.0%94.7%27.6%
Dimensional16.4%78.9%57.4%
State Street and SPDR16.9%77.1%50.4%

Of the 5,821 vote records in this filing, 547 carry something the form does not expect: a missing vote source or category, a record with no vote line, a meeting date that cannot be read, or a security identifier this site could not use. They are counted as filed. What is checked

Votes by category

Filers choose one or more categories for each vote, so a vote can appear in more than one row. Category names are printed as Form N-PX defines them.

Category (as the form names it)VotesForAgainstAgainst managementSplit
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS2,7022,582913.7%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES55249620.7%
AUDIT-RELATED32532230.6%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES87175.0%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS272700.0%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE47947541.9%
COMPENSATION490442484.5%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE9468381083.1%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE134171170.0%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE6913560.0%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION7912670.0%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES190351550.0%
OTHER242130.0%

By season

SeasonVote recordsAgainst managementSay-on-pay supportShareholder-proposal supportSplit
year to 30 June 20245,8212.7%99.6%8.5%
year to 30 June 20255,6052.7%98.8%20.2%
year to 30 June 20265,4542.1%95.2%5.9%

Say-on-pay votes against management

Counting one say-on-pay item per company meeting, Harris Associates and Oakmark voted against management on 1 of the 341 it marked either way (0.3%) in the year to 30 June 2024.

A further 7 say-on-pay items were reported without a management mark and are left out of both sides of that fraction.

Shareholder proposals it supported

Of 141 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the filings and on which it cast a vote, Harris Associates and Oakmark voted for 10 (7.1%). Titles are the most common wording among filers; where a wording could name a person, the SEC category is printed instead.

CompanyMeetingProposal
ConocoPhillips14 May 2024Simple Majority Vote.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.14 Mar 2024To vote on a shareholder proposal regarding simple majority vote
Masco Corporation10 May 2024Consideration of stockholder proposal on Simple Majority Vote.
Alphabet Inc.7 Jun 2024Stockholder proposal regarding equal shareholder voting
DSV A/S14 Mar 2024Report on Efforts and Risks Related to Human and Labor Rights
Pirelli & C. SpA31 Jul 2023Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Pirelli & C. SpA31 Jul 2023Fix Number of Directors
Pirelli & C. SpA28 May 2024Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Pirelli & C. SpA28 May 2024Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
Pirelli & C. SpA28 May 2024Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED

Shares on loan

Harris Associates and Oakmark reported 909,844 shares on loan at record dates against 58.46 billion shares voted: 0.00% of the two together. Median family: 1.34%. Shares lent out at the record date cannot be voted by the lender, which is why Form N-PX asks for the figure. More on lending and votes.

Questions

How did Harris Associates and Oakmark vote on executive pay?

In the year to 30 June 2024 Harris Associates and Oakmark reported 498 votes in the category SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES that were cast for, against or abstain. 496 were for (99.6%), 2 against and 0 abstentions. Counting one item per company meeting, it voted against management on 1 of the 341 say-on-pay items it marked either way. A further 7 say-on-pay items were reported without a management mark and are not counted in that figure.

How often does Harris Associates and Oakmark vote against management?

2.7% of the time in the year to 30 June 2024: 154 of the 5,649 votes it marked as for or against management. Form N-PX asks each filer to state, vote by vote, whether the vote was for or against management's recommendation; this figure counts those marks.

Did Harris Associates and Oakmark support shareholder proposals on climate?

In the category ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE it reported 117 votes on proposals from security holders in the year to 30 June 2024 and voted for 0 of them (0.0%). Across every category it voted for 8.5% of security-holder proposals. Filers choose the category for each vote, so the same proposal can sit in different categories in different filings.

Is this the result of the meetings?

No. Form N-PX shows how this filer voted the shares it held. It does not show how other shareholders voted or whether a proposal was approved. Companies report certified results separately, on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From the Form N-PX filings of the registrants and managers grouped under this family on the SEC's EDGAR system, read as filed. The SEC does not verify the contents. Amended filings (N-PX/A) replace the filings they amend. Data on this page runs through 23 Sep 2026.

Back to the Harris Associates and Oakmark family page · All filers in the year to 30 June 2024

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings of the filers grouped under Harris Associates and Oakmark, read as filed and not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.